In the recent edition of the Forum Crap, there is an article, “Gallagher up to his old tricks: JPCA”, Bob Holden is crying about a new group calling themselves “The Sons and Daughters of Middle Village and Maspeth” and sobbing over a certain “attack blog”. It seems that Mr. Holden feels that because these two entities criticize him they must be investigated and stopped from expressing their views. Is Bob trampling on their First Amendment right?
Moreover, in Bob’s little pea brain he deduces that this is all orchestrated by Councilman Gallagher. Just like Bob claims Gallagher was the third man on the grassy knoll, that the councilman caused the fall of Rome and is single-handedly responsible for global warming. However, we know from reliable sources that the Sons and Daughters of Middle Village and Maspeth” and a certain attack blog operates INDEPENDENTLY of any elected official. Here is a newsflash Bob, PEOPLE DISAGREE WITH YOU! PEOPLE DISLIKE YOUR TACTICS!
In the article, Bob surmises that the titles of some articles posted on the blog automatically prove that the blog is run by a particular elected official. Therefore, using Bob’s distorted reasoning; shall we conclude that the JPCA, Queens Crap, Middle Village Idiots and the Forum West are all pawns of Tony Avella? Here are some headlines from the Queens Crap:
• Avella Suggests Citizen Watch Program.
• Avella vs. Crescent Crap.
• Avella in the Brooklyn Rail.
• Avella Points Finger at Bloomie.
• Avella proposes neighborhood building watches.
• Avella Not Backing Down.
• Avella’s Pool Problem Over.
• Times Ledger vs. Avella.
• Avella Pool Problem Makes NY Times.
• Avella and Gazette Against Water Hike.
• Avella Pool Saga Continues.
• Avella Outs Quinn.
• DOB and Trib Harass Avella Over Backyard Pool.
• Avella Makes Noise Against Noise.
• Avella vs. Liu on Flushing.
Avella seems well liked by Crappy and Bob. Proving the ole adage, “birds of a feather flock together”. Holden and the Crap have attacked so many elected officials it would take hours to print all the titles. The Juniper Park Civic Association plans to show evidence to city officials that Gallagher is responsible for the bogus mailings and the hate blogs. That should be a neat trick since we know there is no evidence to prove the JPCA’s paranoid delusions. Have fun digging Bobby, just make sure you dig a big enough hole for yourself.
God Bless the First Amendment. It protects small independent groups like the “Sons and Daughters of Middle Village and Maspeth” and a certain “attack blog” from tyrannical despots seeking to silence their message.
You're barely Holden on buddy...
5 comments:
Amen Patriots, keep speaking truth to Holden's idiocy.
How about starting a petition to see how many Middle Village residents want to see the JPCA get new leadership?
We may not have to sign a petition Bobby may finally be getting his the Investigators are getting hot and he dosen't even know.
Just to give you a heads up on this. The crapper had a posting of all the people who donated to Gallagher in 2007. However, there is also an option to see who gave to him on 2006.
And take a guess who gave him $600.00 in 2006?? The JPCA did.
I asked them why they didn't mention that fact, but of course my comment was not posted.
Mr Mojo Risin..
keep up the good work.i hear that tony the flower is going to run for dennis seat.i guess that king bob will be writing nice things about this liar.
The Forum is a biased paper that does not report news in any manner of objectivity. One example of this is the the article on the visit of the CB5 parks committee to the Ridgewood Reservoir. That article was written such that the Ridgewood residents who attended the visit, who are members of the parks committee and who have attended all of the forums weighing in on how the park should be used were left out of the article. The article specifically and inaccurately stated who attended. Only Middle Village residents were recorded as attending the visit. Not one Ridgewood resident who attended was reported. This omission is glaring since several Ridgewood residents have been substantially involved in all of the meetings and have weighed in on how the park should be devleloped. They could not have been missed. In fact the Forum reporter had substantial interaction with them and knew their identities. How can anyone respect a paper that is so dishonest?
Post a Comment